Facts: The defendant No.1 claimed to have obtained a patent for process titled as “A Process of manufacturing engraved design articles on metals or non-metals”. The defendants No.2 and 3 are Commissioners of Customs (Import), Officers of Customs. The plaintiff filed a suit seeking declaration and consequential reliefs of injunction on the premise that the…
Facts: There were two suits in this case. One by the plaintiff Bajaj Auto Limited which filed a suit under Section 108 of the Patents Act, 1970 for the relief of permanent injunction in respect of the plaintiff’s patent and/or from using the technology/invention described in the said patent and/or manufacturing, marketing, selling, offering for…
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. Mercury Electronics (Ericsson v. Micromax) STATUS: Pending before the Delhi High Court FACTS: Plaintiff is the registered owner in Indian of eight patents referred to as AMR Patents, 3G Patents and EDGE Patent. He states that all the aforesaid Patents are registered and currently valid. It was alleged by the plaintiff…
Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt. Ltd. v. Intellectual Property Appellate Board, The Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks and John Distilleries Limited AIR 2009 Mad 196, 2010(42)PTC57(Mad) LAW POINTS: Section 21 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 requires a party opposing registration of a trade mark to file a notice of opposition to the registration within…