|

Chappell & Co. Ltd. v. Nestle Co. Ltd.

Chappell & Co. Ltd. v. Nestle Co. Ltd. [1960] AC 87 (Condition v. Consideration, adequacy of consideration) FACTS: C were owners of copyright of a tune called ‘Rocking Shoes’ and N were manufacturers of chocolate who were selling to the public these records in return for 1s6d and three wrappers of chocolate bars manufactured by…

|

Balfour v. Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571

Balfour v. Balfour   [1919] 2 KB 571 (Consideration-Intention to create legal relations) Facts: A husband was employed in Ceylon. He returned with his wife to England on leave, but she was unable to go back to Ceylon with him due to medical reasons. He consequently promised orally to make her an allowance per month until…

|

Butler Machine Tool Co. Ltd. vs. Ex-Cell-O Corporation (England) Ltd.

CITATION(S): [1977] EWCA Civ 9, [1979] 1 WLR 401, 1979 UK 1 All ER 965 FACTS: The sellers of a machine (Butler Machine Tool Co. Ltd.) made an offer (on 23rd May) to the buyers (Ex-Cell-O Corporation) for selling a machine worth a fixed price, subject to certain terms and conditions (T&C), amongst which two prominent ones were: Those T&C shall prevail…

|

Proforce Recruit Ltd vs. The Rugby Group Ltd.

ENTIRE AGREEMENT CLAUSE CITATION: [2006] EWCA Civ 69 FACTS Two English companies entered into a contract whereby one party, an employment agency (“the Agency”), undertook to supply labor personnel and cleaning equipment to the other party (“the Customer”) for a fixed period of time. The written contract contained a clause stating that during the period of…

|

Inntrepreneur Pub Co. vs East Crown Ltd., [2000] 2 Lloyds Rep 611

ENTIRE AGREEMENT CLAUSE CITATION: [2000] 2 Lloyds Rep 611 FACTS The parties to a lease of a tied public house entered into an agreement for a lease containing a restriction requiring the tenant to obtain its beer from nominated suppliers. The agreement for lease contained an acknowledgement that ‘this agreement… constitutes the entire agreement between the…

|

Badri Prasad v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.

Badri Prasad v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr. 1969 SCR (2) 380 (Ascertainment) FACTS: The appellant (A) entered into a contract in respect of certain forests and became entitled to cut teak trees with some specifications.[1]After a legislation[2] vesting the estate in the State, A was prohibited from cutting timber in exercise of his…

|

Digamber Pershad Kirti Prasad v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.

Digamber Pershad Kirti Prasad  v.  State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. AIR 1996 All 1 (Section 2o and 26 of Sale of Goods Act) FACTS: Digambar Pershad, D got the contract of felling trees and collecting timber through an agreement to sell. D commenced the work of felling trees. All the trees were felled, sawn…