Skip to content
Indian Case Law
  • HOME
  • OUR TEAM
  • IP LAW
  • TECHNOLOGY LAW
  • CONTRACT LAW
  • INTERNSHIP
  • GET IN TOUCH
Indian Case Law

Interpretation of Patent Claims

a2-005

CASE INDEX

India

  • Bajaj Auto Ltd., State Of vs. TVS Motor Company Ltd.[1]
  • LG Electronics India Pvt Ltd vs. Bharat Bhogilal Patel & Others
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche Limited, Switzerland and another v Cipla Limited, Mumbai[2]

United Kingdom (UK)

  • Amersham Pharmacia Biotech AB v. Amicon Limited, Millipore (UK) Ltd.[3]
  • Catnic Component Ltd. and Anr. v. Hill & Smith Ltd.[4]
  • Improver Corporation and Ors. v. Remington Consumer Products Ltd. and Ors.[5]
  • Kirin-Amgen Inc v Transkaryotic Therapies Inc (No.2)[6]
  • Lubrizol Corporation and Anr. v. Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd. and Ors.[7]
  • Verathon Medical (Canada) ULC v Aircraft Medical Limited[8]
  • Wheatley v. Drillsafe Ltd.[9]

[1] (2008) ILLJ 726 Mad, MIPR 2008 (1) 217

[2] 2012 Indlaw DEL 1880; 2012 (195) DLT 641; 2012 (52) PTC 1

[3] [2001] EWCA Civ 1042

[4] 1982 RPC 183.

[5] 1990 FSR 181

[6] [2005] R.P.C. 9

[7] 1998 RPC 727

[8] [2011] CSOH 19, 2011 WL 664606

[9] [2001] RPC 133

Categories

Archives

Legal

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright

Navigation

  • HOME
  • OUR TEAM
  • IP LAW
  • TECHNOLOGY LAW
  • CONTRACT LAW
  • INTERNSHIP
  • GET IN TOUCH

© 2023 Indian Case Law

Scroll to top
  • HOME
  • OUR TEAM
  • IP LAW
  • TECHNOLOGY LAW
  • CONTRACT LAW
  • INTERNSHIP
  • GET IN TOUCH