Intellectual Property Rights | Trade Mark | Uncategorized

M/S Arudra Engineers Private Limited v. M/S Patanjali Ayurveda Limited & Anr.; Order disposing Interim Application

M/S Arudra Engineers Private Limited v. M/S Patanjali Ayurveda Limited & Anr. Date of decison: 06.08.2020 Madras High Court For brief facts and history of litigation, you can refer our post on ex-parte order here. We are not repeating the same for sake of brevity. The present summary is of the order on the adjudication…

Corporate Law

In Re: Mohan Exports India Ltd. vs. Tarun Overseas Pvt. Ltd.

In case the proposed scheme is bona fide and genuine and is not against public interest then mere fact that certain immovable properties or right to recover debts etc. are transferred to the transferee company would not mean that they are in violation of any provisions of the Transfer of Property Act. However, if such scheme is only with the ulterior motive to transfer the immovable properties without payment of Government or statutory dues, then the same would be against the public interest and the Court will not approve the scheme.

Linking & Metatagging | Technology Law

Consim Info Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

CITATION: 2013 (54) PTC 578 (Mad) FACTS In this case, the appellant was a private limited company providing online matrimonial services. In the course of its business, it had adopted several trademarks including, inter alia, Bharatmatrimony, Tamilmatrimony, Telugumatrimony, Assamesematrimony, etc. and registered several domain names with these word marks. The respondents (Google India and its parent…

Domain Names | Intellectual Property Rights | Trade Mark

D’zine Garage Pvt. Ltd. vs. D’zine Cafe FZE

D’zine Garage Pvt. Ltd. vs. D’zine Cafe FZE AND D’zine Cafe FZE vs. D’zine Garage Pvt. Ltd. Decided On: 09.10.2007 Key Words: service mark, domain name, phonetically similar, prior user, online communication, website, class 35, publici juris, generic word, distinctiveness FACTS:  The respondent/plaintiff (P) was carrying on the business of a leading interactive agency, specializing in online communication  for a…

Intellectual Property Rights | Parallel Import | Trade Mark

Wipro Cyprus Private Limited v. Zeetel Electronics

Wipro Cyprus Private Limited v. Zeetel Electronics 2010 (44) PTC 307 (Mad) Key Words: parallel import, exhaustion, trade mark, FACTS: The Appellant in this case filed a suit for permanent injunction, restraining the Respondents from using the trade mark YARDLEY or any other phonetically similar expression in any media which can infringe the Applicant’s registered…