| | |

SHOPPERS STOP LTD. V. VINOD’S SHOPPERS STOP

Shoppers Stop Ltd. v. Vinod’s Shoppers Stop CS(OS) No. 458 of 2015 19.09.2016 Delhi High Court The Plaintiff was the proprietor of the mark ‘SHOPPERS STOP’ in all Classes and was using the same since 1991 as a trade mark and as part of trade name .   Over the years, the Plaintiff had created…

| |

Rich Products Corporation & Anr. v Indo Nippon Food Limited

Rich Products Corporation & Anr. v Indo Nippon Food Limited 2010 (44) PTC 515 (Del) Brief Facts: Rich Corporation (Appellant) was the registered proprietor of the mark “RICH’S WHIP TOPPING” for ‘non-dairy topping, icing, filling and generally for other goods’ in Class 30 of the Trade Mark Rules. Appellant claimed that the word mark “WHIP…

| |

M/s. Arjies Aluminim Udyog v. Sudhir Batra, New Delhi

M/s. Arjies Aluminim Udyog v. Sudhir Batra, New Delhi 1997 (17) PTC 187 (Del) Brief Facts: Appellant was using the mark ARJIES for aluminium door and window fittings. Respondent was using the mark ARCHIS for identical goods. Respondent might have addressed a legal notice to the Appellant asking it to restrain itself from using the…

NOVARTIS AG & ORS. v. INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD

NOVARTIS AG & ORS. v. INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. I.A. No. 8421 of 2015 in CS(OS) No. 1120/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: 24.04.2015 Prima Facie Facts: • Plaintiffs were engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of ranibizumab. Plaintiffs also conducted clinical data and scientific research by…

| |

Reckitt Benckiser India Ltd. and Anr. v. Dabur India Ltd.

Reckitt Benckiser India Ltd. and Anr. v. Dabur India Ltd.; CS(OS) No.1829/2014 31.10.2014 (Delhi High Court) In 2006, Plaintiff started using the ‘FIREMAN DEVICE’ to market their product GAVISCON (Drug for heart burn and gastr-oesophagal disease). Defendant came out with an ad of Pudin Hara which also had FIREMAN elements. Plaintiff filed a suit for…