Makhija Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs. City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (CIDCO) & Ors., 2010 (112) BOMLR 1166 (Bombay High Court, 2010)
Gammon India Ltd. vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors., 2003 (1) ARBLR 353 (Delhi) (Delhi High Court, 2002)
M/s. Jagdamba Impex v. Tristar Products Pvt. Ltd.; 05.05.2014; FAO 128 and 129 of 2014 before the Delhi High Court Plaintiff developed a teeth cutting machine. The machine was based on Industrial Drawing and the Plaintiff was the owner of the said artistic work. The Plaintiff was making commercial use of the said drawings by…
In case the proposed scheme is bona fide and genuine and is not against public interest then mere fact that certain immovable properties or right to recover debts etc. are transferred to the transferee company would not mean that they are in violation of any provisions of the Transfer of Property Act. However, if such scheme is only with the ulterior motive to transfer the immovable properties without payment of Government or statutory dues, then the same would be against the public interest and the Court will not approve the scheme.
CASE LIST Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co. vs. Riche, [1875] L. R. 7 HL 653 When an act is performed or a transaction is carried out, which, though legal in itself, is not authorised by the object clause, in the memorandum of association, such an act is null and void. Attorney General vs. Great Eastern…
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Vs. Nirulas Corner House (P) Ltd. 2008 (37) PTC 237 (Del) Plaintiff was a copyright holder of certain literary and musical works, sound recordings, music videos and cinematograph films. Defendant was engaged in the business of hotels. The Plaintiff found that few audio clippings of songs in which the Plaintiff owned…
CASE LIST Section 35 of the Stamp Act operates as a bar to an unstamped instrument being admitted in evidence or being acted upon. Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. M/s. Dilip Construction Co., AIR 1969 SC 1238 Unless the stamp duty and penalty due in respect of the instrument is paid, the court cannot act upon…
CASE LIST: Requirements/ Ingredients Mohd. Kareemuddin Khan and Ors. vs. Syed Azam, 1997 (2) ALT 625 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 1996) Devarapu Narasimharao vs. Yerrabothula Peda Venkaiah and Ors., 1998 (2) ALT 513 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 1997) Dr. K. Subbaiah vs. C.N. Krishnamacharlu and Ors., 2011 (2) ALT 516 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 2010) B.Visalakshi vs. Special Court under A.P. Land…