|

Gherulal Parakh v. Mahadeodas Maiya and Ors.

Gherulal Parakh v. Mahadeodas Maiya and Ors. 1959 AIR 781 (Wagering Agreement-Illegal?-Public Policy?-Immoral?-S.23 and S.30) FACTS: Plaintiff and defendant entered into Partnership agreement with object of entering into wagering transactions with obligation to bear equal loss or profit arising out of such partnership. When plaintiff asked for reimbursement of half of money paid by him…

|

Photo Production Ltd v. Securicor Transport Ltd. (1980)

Photo Production Ltd v. Securicor Transport Ltd.  [1980] UKHL 2 (Exemption clauses) FACTS: Plaintiffs entered into contract with defendant whereby latter was required to provide patrolling services for plaintiff’s factory as provided in contract. But, any liability arising out of default of the employees of the defendants was limited by the standardized contract which provided—under no…

|

Central Inland Water v. Brojo Nath Ganguly and Anr.

Central Inland Water Transport Corporation v. Brojonath Ganguly 1986 SCR (2) 278 (Standardised Contracts-Public Policy-Unconscionable Bargains-S.23-Void) FACTS: Plaintiffs worked in a company which was dissolved by Court’s order and they were then inducted into defendant Corporation upon latter’s T&C. After years of serving Corporation, plaintiffs were arbitrarily kicked out of the Corporation by virtue of…

|

Mohanlal Jagannath v. Kashiram Gokul

Mohanlal Jagannath v. Kashiram Gokul AIR 1950 Nag 71 (74) [Indian Contract Act (ICA), Section(s): 16, 23, 24] FACTS: Panchas delivered an award under which defendant was to convey half of his share in his inherited property to his uncle who was to pay defendant’s share of debt, payable by him. Defendant consented to this award in return for…

|

Lingo Bhimrao Naik v. Dattatrya Shripad Jamadagni

Lingo Bhimrao Naik v. Dattatrya Shripad Jamadagni  (1937) 39  BOM LR 1233 (Minor-Undue Influence-S.16) FACTS: Defendant, adoptive mother of plaintiff, was alleged to use undue-influence to obtain the consent of the plaintiff, once he attained the age of majority, to ratify the gift deeds made to her daughters in regard to non-watan property. Though the…

|

Saunders v. Anglia Building Society

Saunders v. Anglia Building Society [1970] 3 All ER 961 (non-est factum principle) PRINCIPLE: In order for the defense of non-est factum to succeed, the person must show that the transaction which he signed was essentially different in substance or in kind from the one which he purported to sign. Earlier it was thought that this defense could not…

|

Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd. v. Mardon

Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd. v. Mardon [1976] QB 801 (Collateral Warranty and Misrepresentation) FACTS: A much experienced employee of Esso estimated throughput of petrol from particular station (to be built) to reach 200,000 gallons in 3rd year of operation. But, owing to refusal by planning authority, filling station was now built “back to front”. Ignoring…

|

Proform Sports Management Ltd. v. Proactive Sports Management Ltd. and Anr.

Proform Sports Management Ltd. v. Proactive Sports Management Ltd. and Anr. [2007] 1 All ER 542 (Contract for Necessity-Voidable Contract recession) FACTS: Proform entered into a representation contract with wayne rooney, a famous footballer when he was a minor (of 15 years of age). The contract was to expire after two years. During the last…