Complete Guideline on How to Register Trade Mark in India
In this article learn how you can register Trade Mark in India.
Dishonour of Cheque/ Cheque Bouncing: Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
UPDATED: Mr. Ramanbhai Mathurbhai Patel vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr., Cr. Writ Petition No. 2362/2014 (Bombay High Court, August 25, 2014) which discusses the landmark Dashrath Singh judgment delivered by Supreme Court on August 1, 2014.
Hindustan Pencils (P) Ltd. v. India Stationery Products Co. and Anr.
Hindustan Pencils (P) Ltd. v. India Stationery Products Co. and Anr. AIR 1990 Delhi 19 Plaintiff adopted the mark Nataraj with the device of dancing Nataraj in 1961 and got the same registered. Plaintiff’s Case: Plaintiff got to know somewhere in the middle of the year 1985 that the Defendants had registered a copyright similar…
V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works
V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works, Melur AIR 1965 Madras 327 Appellant filed a suit against the Respondent for permanent injunction from manufacturing and selling certain patterns of ploughs on the ground that the same was an infringement of the Appellant’s patent. The Appellant secured an interim injunction, but, on an application filed by…
Walter Bushnell Pvt. Ltd. v. Miracle Life Sciences;
Walter Bushnell Pvt. Ltd. v. Miracle Life Sciences; 26.05.2014; CS(OS) 220 of 2013 before the Delhi High Court Plaintiff Registered Proprietor of DROTIN for medicines claiming user since 1997, Defendants using DROTAMOL The Defendant challenged, the validity of Plaintiff’s mark and the Court observed that “With regard to validity of the trade mark of the…
Case List-IPR | Copyright | Governing Law & Jurisdiction | Intellectual Property Rights | Uncategorized
BLUEBERRY BOOKS & ORS. v. GOOGLE INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS.
BLUEBERRY BOOKS & ORS. v. GOOGLE INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS. 2014 (58) PTC 62 In 2003, the Plaintiffs published a series of books under the name ‘Moral Stories’ in 4 Parts. They claimed that the stories contained in the aforementioned books are original literary and artistic works of the Plaintiffs and are protected under…
Dabur India Limited Vs Emami Limited
Dabur India Limited Vs.Emami Limited 2004 (29) PTC 1 (Del) Plaintiff was the manufacturer of Dabur Chayawanprash. Plaintiff had a market share of 63% of the total market of Chayawanprash in India. Defendant was also engaged in the manufacture of various ayurvedic formulations including Chayawanprash. Defendant was manufacturing the said Chayawanprash under the brand name…
ESOP under the new Companies Act, 2013
Can ESOPs be issued to the Promoters and Directors under the New Companies Act, 2013? What are the restrictions in terms of percentage? Section 2(37) of the new Companies Act defines employees’ stock option means (ESOP) as- “The option given to the directors, officers or employees of a company or of its holding company or…
Dishonour of Cheque/ Cheque Bouncing: Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
CASE LIST Prosecution based on second or successive dishonour of cheque shall be permissible. MSR Leathers vs. S. Palaniappan and Anr., (2013) 10 SCC 568 (Supreme Court, 2013) [Summary] Territorial Jurisdiction in Cheque Bouncing Case K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vidhyan Balan, (1999) 7 SCC 510 Shri Ishar Alloy Steels Ltd. v. Jayaswals Neco Ltd., (2001) 3 SCC 609 Harman…
Licenses-Approvals-Registrations
Well, though this is slightly different from what we do at Indian Case Laws but nonetheless it’s not completely useless either. We aim to provide a list of licenses, a particular kind of business need to have in order to operate in a specific industry at a state or central level. We are currently in…
Case Summaries
On my first day at Law school, my Constitution Law Professor said, “The best way to learn Law is to read Judgments.” I started with the benchmark Kesavananda Bharti Case and I am still reading it. Welcome to a law school and welcome to the world of endless piles of judgments. Well a lawyer is not really a…
Dharampal Premchand Ltd. v. Golden Tobacco Products
Dharampal Premchand Ltd. v. Golden Tobacco Products 2007(34) PTC 633 (Del.) (DB) Decided on: 08.05.2007 Plaintiff had filed a suit for infringement of it’s trademark ‘BABA’, for breach of it’s copyright and for passing off. The Defendant filed an application under Order VII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking rejection of…