| |

Worknest Business Centre LLP & Anr. v. M/s. Worknests Through Shri Rajesh Goel

IA No. 8773 of 2020 in CS (Comm) No. 406 of 2020 Date of decision: 21st March, 2023 Brief Facts: Plaintiffs’ Contentions: Defendants’ Contentions: Plaintiffs’ Rejoinder: Court’s Observations: Temporary Injunction was granted against the Defendants.

Neetu Singh & Anr. v. Telegram FZ LLC & Ors.
| | | | |

Neetu Singh & Anr. v. Telegram FZ LLC & Ors.

Neetu Singh & Anr. v. Telegram FZ LLC & Ors. 2022 SCC Online Del 2637 Brief Facts: Plaintiffs filed the suit seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, damages and other reliefs in respect of unauthorised dissemination of Plaintiffs’ copyrighted materials. Defendant No. 1 is operator of is a messaging platform which enables transmission of…

Delhivery Private Limited v. Treasure Vase Ventures Private Limited
| |

Delhivery Private Limited v. Treasure Vase Ventures Private Limited

14th August, 2020 High Court of Delhi CS (Comm) No. 217 of 2020 Brief Facts: Plaintiff was engaged in the business of logistics, transportation and management under the Trademark “DELHIVERY” since 2011. Plaintiff had 27 registrations pertaining the mark ‘DELHIVERY’ under Classes 35, 39 and 42 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Defendant, on the…

Gurnam Sigh v. G.I. Cosmetics
| | |

Gurnam Sigh v. G.I. Cosmetics

2019 (77) PTC 222 (Del) Brief Facts: Plaintiff was using the mark ‘BLUE HEAVEN’ since 1972 for cosmetic products. Defendant started to use the mark ‘MISS HEAVEN’ in the year 2016 for identical goods. Plaintiff filed a suit for infringement of trade mark and passing off against the Defendant. Along with the suit, the Plaintiff…

| | | |

A GUIDE TO WELL-KNOWN TRADE MARKS

 “There are marks which are different from other marks. There are names which are different from other names. There are names and marks which have become household words.” – Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mahinder Narain, Hon’ble High Court of Delhi (Daimler Benz Aktiegesellschaft & Anr. v. Hybo Hindustan; 1994 PTC 287) Abstract: Intellectual Property has many…

| |

Bayer Corporation and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

Bayer Corporation and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. and Bayer Intellectual Property Gmbh & Anr. v. Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. 2019 (78) PTC 521 (Del); Division Bench Brief Facts 1: NATCO Dispute Bayer Corporation (hereinafter ‘Bayer’) filed a suit for infringement of Patent against Natco. During the pendency of the suit, Natco obtained a…

| |

Intellectual Property Attorneys Association v. The Controller Genreral of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks & Anr.

Intellectual Property Attorneys Association v. The Controller Genreral of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks & Anr.  2019 (80) PTC 486 (Del) Delhi High Court Aggrieved by the practice of the Trade Marks Office of not giving speaking orders toward srefusal of trade mark registration and thereafter relying upon Rule 36 of the Trade Marks Rules,…

| |

MRF Limited v. Metro Tyres Limited

MRF Limited v. Metro Tyres Limited 2019 (79) PTC 368 (Del) Delhi High Court Brief Facts: Plaintiff produced an audio-visual advertisement titled as “MRF NV Series present REVZ”. As per the Plaintiff, the Defendant, who was involved in the same business of manufacturing and marketing of tyres, had produced similar advertisement titled “Bazooka Radial Tyres”….

| |

Radico Khaitan Ltd. v. Devans Modern Breweries Ltd.

Radico Khaitan Ltd. v. Devans Modern Breweries Ltd. 258 (2019) DLT 177 Radico Khaitan Ltd. filed a suit for Infringement of Trade Mark and Passing Off against Devans Modern Breweries Ltd. in respect of the Trade Mark ELECTRA in respect of alcoholic beverages. Radico Khaitan Ltd. manufactured Ready to Drink Vodka Infused alcoholic Beverage under…