Allied Blenders & Distillers Pvt. Ltd. v. Shree Nath Heritage Liquor Pvt. Ltd. 01.07.2014; CS(OS) 2589 of 2013 before Delhi High Court Plaintiff was using the mark Officer’s Choice since 1988. Defendant was using the mark Collector’s Choice. In it’s application for registration of the mark, the Defendant stated that if Officer’s Choice and Minister…
CASE LIST If the defendant raises a Credible Challenge to the validity of Patent injunction should not be granted to the plaintiff. V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works; AIR 1965 Mad. 327 M/s. Standipack Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. M/s. Oswal Trading Co. Ltd. and Ors.; AIR 2000 Delhi 23 F. Hoffmann-LA Roche Ltd….
Composite Contracts and Applicability of Sales Tax on Photography M/s. Rainbow Colour Lab and Anr, vs. State of Madhya Pradesh; (AIR 2000 SC 808) M/s. Associated Cement Companies Ltd. etc. etc. vs. Commissioner of Customs; (AIR 2001 SC 862) Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. vs. Union of India; (2006) 3 SCC 1 R. Mini Colour Lab v. Tamil Nadu…
Titan Industries Vs. Nitin P. Jain and Anr. 2006 (32) PTC 95 (Del) The Plaintiff was incorporated in the year 1987 and its activities included manufacturing and marketing of watches, clocks and jewellery. The cause of filing the suit was the manufacturing and marketing of watches by the Defendants under the trade name/trade mark SONA…
CASE LIST Sarl Louis Feraud International vs. Viewfinder, Inc. No. 05-5927-CV, 2007 WL 1598057, 2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Compuserve, Inc. vs. Patterson, 89 F.3d 1257 (6th Cir. 1996) [Text] Zippo Manufacturing Co. vs. Zippo Dot Com, Inc., 952 F. Supp. 1119 (W.D. Pa. 1997) [Text] Panavision International, L.P. vs. Toeppen, 141 F.3d 1316 (9th Cir. 1998), aff’g 945…
CASE LIST Section 35 of the Stamp Act operates as a bar to an unstamped instrument being admitted in evidence or being acted upon. Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. M/s. Dilip Construction Co., AIR 1969 SC 1238 Unless the stamp duty and penalty due in respect of the instrument is paid, the court cannot act upon…