Child Custody
CASE LAWS
Custody to Father: Criteria
Prakash Chandra Jain vs. Smt. Chandrawati Jain, AIR 1996 Raj 162 (High Court of Rajasthan, 1995 )
Mausami Moitra Ganguli vs. Jayant Ganguli, AIR 2008 SC 2262 (Supreme Court, 2008)
Prakash Chandra Jain vs. Smt. Chandrawati Jain, AIR 1996 Raj 162 (High Court of Rajasthan, 1995 )
Mausami Moitra Ganguli vs. Jayant Ganguli, AIR 2008 SC 2262 (Supreme Court, 2008)
A foreign judgment which is conclusive under Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, can be enforced in India by: By filing an Execution Petition under Section 44A of the Civil Procedure Code (“CPC”)[1] (in case the conditions specified therein are fulfilled). By filing a suit upon the foreign judgment /decree.[2] In both…
CASE LIST Jurisdiction of Wakf Tribunal M. Bikshapathi vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Ors., 2002 (2) ALT 530 (High Court of Andhra Pradesh, 1999) Jai Bharat Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Andhra Pradesh. State Wakf Board, Hyd., 2000 (5) ALT 389 (High Court of Andhra Pradesh, 2000) Syed Muneer vs. Chief Executive Officer and Ors., 2002 (1) ALT 386 (High Court of…
LT Foods Limited v. Heritage Foods (India) Limited; 07.05.2014; FAO (OS) 3 of 2014 before the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court The Appellant filed a suit seeking towards infringement and passing off of it’s trade mark HERITAGE. Respondent was a registered proprietor of the Trade Mark HERITAGE for the same goods. Therefore, the…
FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT Sony Corp. of America vs. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984) [Full Text] Fonovisa, Inc. vs. Cherry Auctions, 76 F.3d 259 (9th Cir. 1996) [Full Text] CoStar Group, Inc. vs. LoopNet, Inc., 373 F.3d 544 (4th Cir. 2004) Viacom International, Inc. vs. YouTube, Inc. 17 U.S.C Sec 512(c) Gordon Roy Parker v. Google, Inc.,…
CASE LIST K. Raheja Corporation Private Limited and Anr. vs. State of Goa and Ors., 2011(2) ALL MR 128 (Bombay High Court, 2010) Pathan Mohammed Suleman Rehmatkhan vs. State of Gujarat and Ors., 2013 (14) SCALE 385 (Supreme Court, 2013)
Procter & Gamble Manufacturing (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. & Ors. v. Anchor Health & Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd.; 30.05.2014; FAO(OS) No. 241 of 2014 before the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court Respondent was Regd. Proprietor of the mark ALLROUND claiming user since 2004. Appellant started using ‘ALL-AROUND PROTECTION’ for tooth paste and ALL ROUNDER…