Child Custody
CASE LAWS
Custody to Father: Criteria
Prakash Chandra Jain vs. Smt. Chandrawati Jain, AIR 1996 Raj 162 (High Court of Rajasthan, 1995 )
Mausami Moitra Ganguli vs. Jayant Ganguli, AIR 2008 SC 2262 (Supreme Court, 2008)
Similar Posts
Case List: Contract of personal services cannot be specifically enforced
A contract of personal service cannot be specifically enforced in a civil suit. Case List Jitendra Nath Biswas vs. M/s. Empire of India and Ceylon Tea Co. and Anr., 1989, Supreme Court, (1989) 3 SCC 582; Pearlite Liners Pvt. Ltd. vs. Manorama Sirsi, 2004, Supreme Court; (2004) 3 SCC 172; Apollo Tyres Ltd. vs. C.P. Sebastian, 2009,…
Disruption of business of Defendant, not a ground to deny injunction
CASE LIST Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions (P) Ltd.; AIR 1977 Delhi 41
Case List: Cyber Defamation
INDIA SMC Pneumatics India Pvt. Ltd. v. Jogesh Kwatra, CS(OS) No. 1279/2001 (Delhi High Court, 2001) Avnish Bajaj vs. State, (2005) 3 CompLJ 364 Del (Delhi High Court, 2005) [Summary] Vyakti Vikas Kendra, India Public Charitable Trust Thr Trustee Mahesh Gupta & Ors vs. Jitender Bagga & Anr., CS(OS) No. 1340/2012 (Delhi High Court, 2012) [Summary] Google India Pvt. Ltd….
J.R. Kapoor Vs. Micronix India
J.R. Kapoor Vs. Micronix India 1994 Supp (3) SCC 215 Respondent as well as the Appellant manufactured and sold various electrical and electronic goods. Respondent filed a suit for injunction against the use of the trade name ‘MICROTEL’, the logo ‘M’ and the Packing carton on the ground that the same is similar to it’s…
Triumphant Institute of Management Education v. Aspiring Mind Assessment Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Triumphant Institute of Management Education v. Aspiring Mind Assessment Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. 13.05.2014: CS(OS) No. 1058 of 2014 before the High Court of Delhi Plaintiff claimed to be proprietor of the mark AIMCAT in Classes 16 and 41 claiming user from 2002. Defendant was using AMCAT since 2008 and the same was an abbreviation…
Case List: Procedural aspects of Trademark Law
Procedure prescribed in Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 read with Rule 67 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2002 is mandatory. Union of India Vs. Malhotra Book Depot, 2013 (54) PTC 165 (Del) (DB) [Summary] CIPLA Limited Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks Boudhik Sampada Bhawan and Union of India through Ministry of Commerce Department of…