Child Custody
CASE LAWS
Custody to Father: Criteria
Prakash Chandra Jain vs. Smt. Chandrawati Jain, AIR 1996 Raj 162 (High Court of Rajasthan, 1995 )
Mausami Moitra Ganguli vs. Jayant Ganguli, AIR 2008 SC 2262 (Supreme Court, 2008)
Similar Posts
Case List: Doctrine of desuetude
Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. AND Abhijeet Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Chief Secretary, State of Jharkhand, (2012) 11 SCC 1 “The doctrine of desuetude denotes principle of quasi repeal but this doctrine is ordinarily seen with disfavour. Although doctrine of desuetude has been made applicable in India on few occasions but for its applicability, two…
Case List: Winding Up
A Admitted Debt u/s 433(3) of Companies Act, 1956 Alternative Remedy to be initiated before invoking just and equitable clause u/s 433 (f) B Bona fide dispute C Commercial Insolvency Creditor’s Objection to Winding Up Composite petitions under Sections 397, 398 and 433(f) D Dissolution of Partnership and Deadlock as grounds for Winding Up under Section…
Triumphant Institute of Management Education v. Aspiring Mind Assessment Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Triumphant Institute of Management Education v. Aspiring Mind Assessment Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. 13.05.2014: CS(OS) No. 1058 of 2014 before the High Court of Delhi Plaintiff claimed to be proprietor of the mark AIMCAT in Classes 16 and 41 claiming user from 2002. Defendant was using AMCAT since 2008 and the same was an abbreviation…
Case List-IPR | Copyright | Governing Law & Jurisdiction | Intellectual Property Rights | Trade Mark
Dhodha House Vs. S.K. Maingi & Patel Field Marshal Industries and Ors. Vs. P.M. Diesel Limited
Dhodha House Vs. S.K. Maingi & Patel Field Marshal Industries and Ors. Vs. P.M. Diesel Limited (2006) 9 SCC 41 In this matter, there were two civil appeals before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Facts: 1st Civil Appeal Appellant filed a suit against the Respondent to protect his copyright, trade marks and common law rights as…
Procter & Gamble Manufacturing (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. & Ors. v. Anchor Health & Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd.
Procter & Gamble Manufacturing (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. & Ors. v. Anchor Health & Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd.; 30.05.2014; FAO(OS) No. 241 of 2014 before the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court Respondent was Regd. Proprietor of the mark ALLROUND claiming user since 2004. Appellant started using ‘ALL-AROUND PROTECTION’ for tooth paste and ALL ROUNDER…
Disruption of business of Defendant, not a ground to deny injunction
CASE LIST Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions (P) Ltd.; AIR 1977 Delhi 41