Child Custody
CASE LAWS
Custody to Father: Criteria
Prakash Chandra Jain vs. Smt. Chandrawati Jain, AIR 1996 Raj 162 (High Court of Rajasthan, 1995 )
Mausami Moitra Ganguli vs. Jayant Ganguli, AIR 2008 SC 2262 (Supreme Court, 2008)
Similar Posts
VAT
CASE LIST State has the power to impose VAT on sale of under-construction Property (under Work Contracts) Gannon Dunkerley and Co. vs. State of Rajasthan, (1993) 1 SCC 364 K. Raheja Development Corporation vs. State of Karnataka, (2005) 5 SCC 162 – As long as the agreement was entered into before the construction was “complete”, it would…
Case List: Contract of personal services cannot be specifically enforced
A contract of personal service cannot be specifically enforced in a civil suit. Case List Jitendra Nath Biswas vs. M/s. Empire of India and Ceylon Tea Co. and Anr., 1989, Supreme Court, (1989) 3 SCC 582; Pearlite Liners Pvt. Ltd. vs. Manorama Sirsi, 2004, Supreme Court; (2004) 3 SCC 172; Apollo Tyres Ltd. vs. C.P. Sebastian, 2009,…
Case List: LIABILITIES OF ISPs AND INTERMEDIARIES
FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT Sony Corp. of America vs. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984) [Full Text] Fonovisa, Inc. vs. Cherry Auctions, 76 F.3d 259 (9th Cir. 1996) [Full Text] CoStar Group, Inc. vs. LoopNet, Inc., 373 F.3d 544 (4th Cir. 2004) Viacom International, Inc. vs. YouTube, Inc. 17 U.S.C Sec 512(c) Gordon Roy Parker v. Google, Inc.,…
Taxability of Profit
CASE LIST Taxability of Profit from Supply of Equipment Outside India Ishikawajima Harinia Heavy Industries Ltd. v. DIT, Mumbai, (2007) 3 SCC 481 – No part of profit arising from the supply of equipment outside India would be chargeable to tax in India.
Non-Protection to Descriptive Marks
CASE LIST J.R. Kapoor v. Micronix India; 1994 Supp (3) SCC 215 (Micro) Rich Products Corporation and Anr. v. Indo Nippon Food Ltd.; 2010 (42) PTC 660(Del) (Whip Topping) Rich Products Corporation and Anr. v. Indo Nippon Food Ltd.; 2010 (44) PTC 515 (Del) (DB) (Whip Topping) [Summary] Cadila Healthcare Limited v. Dabur India Limited; 2008 (38)…
3M Innovative Properties Company & Anr. Vs. Venus Safety & Health Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
3M Innovative Properties Company & Anr. Vs. Venus Safety & Health Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Plaintiff No. 1 was the owner of the suit patent for flat folded personal respiratory device. The invention was being used against air pollution specifically for dusts. It was alleged by the plaintiffs that the defendants infringed their suit patents….