Prakash Chandra Jain vs. Smt. Chandrawati Jain, AIR 1996 Raj 162 (High Court of Rajasthan, 1995 )
Mausami Moitra Ganguli vs. Jayant Ganguli, AIR 2008 SC 2262 (Supreme Court, 2008)
CASE LIST Reckitt and Colman of India vs. Kiwi TTK Ltd.;1996 16 PTC 393 Hindustan Lever vs. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd.; AIR 1998 SC 526 Reckitt and Colman of India Ltd. vs. M.P. Ramchandran and Anr.; 1999 1 PTC 741 Dabur India Ltd. v. Emami Limited; 112(2004)DLT73 [Summary] Dabur India Limited vs. Colgate Palmolive India…
CASE LIST K. Raheja Corporation Private Limited and Anr. vs. State of Goa and Ors., 2011(2) ALL MR 128 (Bombay High Court, 2010) Pathan Mohammed Suleman Rehmatkhan vs. State of Gujarat and Ors., 2013 (14) SCALE 385 (Supreme Court, 2013)
CASE LIST A copyrighted article does not fall within the purview of Royalty (under the Finland DTAA) Director of Income Tax vs. Ericsson, 343 ITR 370 Director of Income Tax vs. M/s. Nokia Networks Oy, [2013] 358 ITR 259 (Delhi) [Summary] Director of Income Tax vs. Infrasoft Ltd., (2014) 264 CTR (Del) 329 [Summary] Payments to Satellite Operators for…
Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd., Citation: [2010] 156 CompCas 455 (SC), (2010) 7 SCC 1 Decided on: 07.05.2010 Issue: Whether the MoU entered into amongst the family members of the Promoter was binding upon the corporate entity Relevant Extract(s): “MoU is not technically binding between RIL and RNRL. It is not in dispute that MoU…
CASE LIST It is the assignment of trade mark that creates rights in favour of the assignee and not the registration of assignment as contemplated in Section 45 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. If the application for getting transferred the registered trademark in the office of the Registrar is pending, that does not debar…
CASE LIST Sarl Louis Feraud International vs. Viewfinder, Inc. No. 05-5927-CV, 2007 WL 1598057, 2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Compuserve, Inc. vs. Patterson, 89 F.3d 1257 (6th Cir. 1996) [Text] Zippo Manufacturing Co. vs. Zippo Dot Com, Inc., 952 F. Supp. 1119 (W.D. Pa. 1997) [Text] Panavision International, L.P. vs. Toeppen, 141 F.3d 1316 (9th Cir. 1998), aff’g 945…
