Child Custody
CASE LAWS
Custody to Father: Criteria
Prakash Chandra Jain vs. Smt. Chandrawati Jain, AIR 1996 Raj 162 (High Court of Rajasthan, 1995 )
Mausami Moitra Ganguli vs. Jayant Ganguli, AIR 2008 SC 2262 (Supreme Court, 2008)
Similar Posts
Adverse Possession
CASE LIST: Requirements/ Ingredients Mohd. Kareemuddin Khan and Ors. vs. Syed Azam, 1997 (2) ALT 625 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 1996) Devarapu Narasimharao vs. Yerrabothula Peda Venkaiah and Ors., 1998 (2) ALT 513 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 1997) Dr. K. Subbaiah vs. C.N. Krishnamacharlu and Ors., 2011 (2) ALT 516 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 2010) B.Visalakshi vs. Special Court under A.P. Land…
Non-Protection to Descriptive Marks
CASE LIST J.R. Kapoor v. Micronix India; 1994 Supp (3) SCC 215 (Micro) Rich Products Corporation and Anr. v. Indo Nippon Food Ltd.; 2010 (42) PTC 660(Del) (Whip Topping) Rich Products Corporation and Anr. v. Indo Nippon Food Ltd.; 2010 (44) PTC 515 (Del) (DB) (Whip Topping) [Summary] Cadila Healthcare Limited v. Dabur India Limited; 2008 (38)…
Case List: Hyperlinking & Framing
Find out what troubles you can invite by simply linking to a website and asking your website developer to provide for framing web content from other websites. The complete article will follow soon.
Case List: Doctrine of desuetude
Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. AND Abhijeet Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Chief Secretary, State of Jharkhand, (2012) 11 SCC 1 “The doctrine of desuetude denotes principle of quasi repeal but this doctrine is ordinarily seen with disfavour. Although doctrine of desuetude has been made applicable in India on few occasions but for its applicability, two…
Diamond Comic Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. Raja Pocket Books and Ors.
Diamond Comic Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. Raja Pocket Books and Ors. MANU/DE/1261/2005 Brief Facts: Court’s Observations:
M/s. Jagdamba Impex v. Tristar Products Pvt. Ltd.
M/s. Jagdamba Impex v. Tristar Products Pvt. Ltd.; 05.05.2014; FAO 128 and 129 of 2014 before the Delhi High Court Plaintiff developed a teeth cutting machine. The machine was based on Industrial Drawing and the Plaintiff was the owner of the said artistic work. The Plaintiff was making commercial use of the said drawings by…