Erusian Equipment and Chemicals Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal and Anr., AIR 1975 SC 266 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Siemens Engg. & Mfg. Co. of India Ltd. vs. Union of India, AIR 1976 SC 1785 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Mekaster Trading Corporation vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. 2003 (71) DRJ 376 (Delhi High Court, 2003)
Allahabad Traders vs. State of U.P. and Anr., 2011 (2) ADJ 723 (Allahabad High Court, 2011)
Allied Blenders & Distillers Pvt. Ltd. v. Shree Nath Heritage Liquor Pvt. Ltd. 01.07.2014; CS(OS) 2589 of 2013 before Delhi High Court Plaintiff was using the mark Officer’s Choice since 1988. Defendant was using the mark Collector’s Choice. In it’s application for registration of the mark, the Defendant stated that if Officer’s Choice and Minister…
CASE LIST Dishonest disposal of the company’s properties and non-crediting of the proceeds thereof in the accounts of the company B.M. Bajoria vs. Union of India and Ors.[1] Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property [S. 420 read with S. 120(B) of IPC] S.C. Chaddha and Ors. vs. State of Delhi[2] S.P. Gupta and Ors….
CASE LIST It is the assignment of trade mark that creates rights in favour of the assignee and not the registration of assignment as contemplated in Section 45 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. If the application for getting transferred the registered trademark in the office of the Registrar is pending, that does not debar…
Dhodha House Vs. S.K. Maingi & Patel Field Marshal Industries and Ors. Vs. P.M. Diesel Limited (2006) 9 SCC 41 In this matter, there were two civil appeals before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Facts: 1st Civil Appeal Appellant filed a suit against the Respondent to protect his copyright, trade marks and common law rights as…
M/s. Jagdamba Impex v. Tristar Products Pvt. Ltd.; 05.05.2014; FAO 128 and 129 of 2014 before the Delhi High Court Plaintiff developed a teeth cutting machine. The machine was based on Industrial Drawing and the Plaintiff was the owner of the said artistic work. The Plaintiff was making commercial use of the said drawings by…
Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd., Citation: [2010] 156 CompCas 455 (SC), (2010) 7 SCC 1 Decided on: 07.05.2010 Issue: Whether the MoU entered into amongst the family members of the Promoter was binding upon the corporate entity Relevant Extract(s): “MoU is not technically binding between RIL and RNRL. It is not in dispute that MoU…