|

Adverse Possession

ByVivek Kumar Verma

CASE LIST:

Requirements/ Ingredients

  • Mohd. Kareemuddin Khan and Ors. vs. Syed Azam, 1997 (2) ALT 625 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 1996)
  • Devarapu Narasimharao vs. Yerrabothula Peda Venkaiah and Ors., 1998 (2) ALT 513 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 1997)
  • Dr. K. Subbaiah vs. C.N. Krishnamacharlu and Ors., 2011 (2) ALT 516 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 2010)
  • B.Visalakshi vs. Special Court under A.P. Land Grabbing Act, Hyderabad & Anr., MANU/AP/0379/2012 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 2012)

Similar Posts
| | |

Case List: Cyber Defamation

ByVivek Kumar Verma

INDIA SMC Pneumatics India Pvt. Ltd. v. Jogesh Kwatra, CS(OS) No. 1279/2001 (Delhi High Court, 2001) Avnish Bajaj vs. State, (2005) 3 CompLJ 364 Del (Delhi High Court, 2005) [Summary] Vyakti Vikas Kendra, India Public Charitable Trust Thr Trustee Mahesh Gupta & Ors vs. Jitender Bagga & Anr., CS(OS) No. 1340/2012 (Delhi High Court, 2012) [Summary] Google India Pvt. Ltd….

State of Haryana and Ors. vs. Navir Singh and Anr.

ByVivek Kumar Verma

State of Haryana and Ors. vs. Navir Singh and Anr. AND State of Punjab and Ors. vs. Pagro Foods Ltd. and Ors. Before: Supreme Court of India Date of Judgment: October 7, 2013 Facts: The facts in both the cases being similar, these cases were heard jointly by the Court. Punjab National Bank (“PNB”) sanctioned…

| | |

V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works

ByAnkit Rastogi

V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works, Melur AIR 1965 Madras 327 Appellant filed a suit against the Respondent for permanent injunction from manufacturing and selling certain patterns of ploughs on the ground that the same was an infringement of the Appellant’s patent. The Appellant secured an interim injunction, but, on an application filed by…

| |

J.R. Kapoor Vs. Micronix India

ByAnkit Rastogi

J.R. Kapoor Vs. Micronix India 1994 Supp (3) SCC 215 Respondent as well as the Appellant manufactured and sold various electrical and electronic goods. Respondent filed a suit for injunction against the use of the trade name ‘MICROTEL’, the logo ‘M’ and the Packing carton on the ground that the same is similar to it’s…

Composite Contract of Service and Sale

ByVivek Kumar Verma

Case History: Prior to the 46th Amendment of the Indian Constitution, composite contracts such as works contracts, hire-purchase contacts and catering contracts were not assessable as contracts for sale of goods. The locus classicus holding the field was State of Madras v. Gannon Dunkerley & Co. 9 STC 353 (SC). The classic concept of sale was…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *