Dishonour of Cheque/ Cheque Bouncing: Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
CASE LIST
Prosecution based on second or successive dishonour of cheque shall be permissible.
- MSR Leathers vs. S. Palaniappan and Anr., (2013) 10 SCC 568 (Supreme Court, 2013) [Summary]
Territorial Jurisdiction in Cheque Bouncing Case
- K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vidhyan Balan, (1999) 7 SCC 510
- Shri Ishar Alloy Steels Ltd. v. Jayaswals Neco Ltd., (2001) 3 SCC 609
- Harman Electronics Pvt.Ltd. v. National Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd., (2009) 1 SCC 720
- Dashrath Rupsingh Rathore vs. State of Maharashtra, MANU/SC/0655/2014 (Supreme Court, August 1, 2014) [Summary] [Full Text]
- Mr. Ramanbhai Mathurbhai Patel vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr., Cr. Writ Petition No. 2362/2014 (Bombay High Court, August 25, 2014) [Summary] [Full Text]
The period of six months provided in Section 138 (a) of the Act excludes the first day of drawl and includes the last day of the sixth month.
-
Rameshchandra Ambalal Joshi vs. State of Gujarat and Anr., 2014 (2) SCALE 515, [Summary]
Reblogged this on and commented:
UPDATED: Mr. Ramanbhai Mathurbhai Patel vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr., Cr. Writ Petition No. 2362/2014 (Bombay High Court, August 25, 2014) which discusses the landmark Dashrath Singh judgment delivered by Supreme Court on August 1, 2014.