Disruption of business of Defendant, not a ground to deny injunction
CASE LIST
- Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions (P) Ltd.; AIR 1977 Delhi 41
Similar Posts
Case List: Doctrine of desuetude
Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. AND Abhijeet Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Chief Secretary, State of Jharkhand, (2012) 11 SCC 1 “The doctrine of desuetude denotes principle of quasi repeal but this doctrine is ordinarily seen with disfavour. Although doctrine of desuetude has been made applicable in India on few occasions but for its applicability, two…
Cipla Limited v. Novartis AG and Ors.
Cipla Limited v. Novartis AG and Ors. 2017 (70) PTC 80 (Del) Respondents (Novartis AG and Ors.) filed a suit for permanent injunction seeking to restrain the Appellant (Cipla Ltd.) from infringing its Patent. Along with the suit, Respondents had also filed an application for interim relief of temporary injunction during the pendency of the…
Dishonour of Cheque/ Cheque Bouncing: Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
CASE LIST Prosecution based on second or successive dishonour of cheque shall be permissible. MSR Leathers vs. S. Palaniappan and Anr., (2013) 10 SCC 568 (Supreme Court, 2013) [Summary] Territorial Jurisdiction in Cheque Bouncing Case K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vidhyan Balan, (1999) 7 SCC 510 Shri Ishar Alloy Steels Ltd. v. Jayaswals Neco Ltd., (2001) 3 SCC 609 Harman…
Raja Pocket Books v. Radha Pocket Books
Raja Pocket Books v. Radha Pocket Books Before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi 1997 PTC (17) Decided on: 06.12.1996 Plaintiff filed a suit against the Defendant seeking declaration and permanent injunction restraining infringement of Copyright as well as Passing Off by use of the name and character ‘NAGESH’ which was deceptively…
Case List: Binding Nature of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)
Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd., Citation: [2010] 156 CompCas 455 (SC), (2010) 7 SCC 1 Decided on: 07.05.2010 Issue: Whether the MoU entered into amongst the family members of the Promoter was binding upon the corporate entity Relevant Extract(s): “MoU is not technically binding between RIL and RNRL. It is not in dispute that MoU…
Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce vs. Kannada Grahakara Koota & Ors.
Citation: Appeal No. 13/2016 with I.A. No. 08/2017 Decided on: 10.04.2017 Court: Competition Appellate Tribunal Facts Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (Appellant/ KFCC) filed an appeal against the order passed by Competition Commission of India (“CCI“). CCI had imposed the penalty on Appellant and other two associations namely Karnataka Television Association (“KTVA“) and Kannada Film…