No need to prove actual damage
CASE LIST
- Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhai Shah & Anr.; 2002 (24) PTC 1 [Summary]
- Prakash Glass and Rubber Works & Anr. v . Hindustan Safety Glass Works Pvt. Ltd.; 2006 (2) Calcutta High Court Notes 555
Similar Posts
Blacklisting / Holiday List
CASE LIST: Arbitrary Decision to Blacklist: Erusian Equipment and Chemicals Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal and Anr., AIR 1975 SC 266 (Supreme Court, 1975) Siemens Engg. & Mfg. Co. of India Ltd. vs. Union of India, AIR 1976 SC 1785 (Supreme Court, 1976) Mekaster Trading Corporation vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. 2003 (71) DRJ 376…
Case List: Amalgamation
CASE LIST The fact that majority has approved the amalgamation scheme is not conclusive, however, it must be taken into account before in sanctioning the scheme. Sugarcane Growers and Sakthi Sugars Shareholders’ Association Vs. Sakthi Sugars Ltd., [1998] 93 CompCas 646 (Mad) J. S. Davar Vs. Shankar Vishnu Marathe, AIR 1967 Bom 456 While the court is not supposed…
V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works
V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works, Melur AIR 1965 Madras 327 Appellant filed a suit against the Respondent for permanent injunction from manufacturing and selling certain patterns of ploughs on the ground that the same was an infringement of the Appellant’s patent. The Appellant secured an interim injunction, but, on an application filed by…
VAT
CASE LIST State has the power to impose VAT on sale of under-construction Property (under Work Contracts) Gannon Dunkerley and Co. vs. State of Rajasthan, (1993) 1 SCC 364 K. Raheja Development Corporation vs. State of Karnataka, (2005) 5 SCC 162 – As long as the agreement was entered into before the construction was “complete”, it would…
Tekla Corporation & Anr. v. Survo Ghosh & Anr.
Tekla Corporation & Anr. v. Survo Ghosh & Anr.; 16.05.2014; CS(OS) 2414 of 2011 befpre the Delhi High Court Plaintiffs filed a suit for infringement of Copyright in Computer Programme. Defendant raised a defence of Copyright Misuse in the Statement and pressed for framing of issue on the same. Plaintiff contended that there is no…
3M Innovative Properties Company & Anr. Vs. Venus Safety & Health Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
3M Innovative Properties Company & Anr. Vs. Venus Safety & Health Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Plaintiff No. 1 was the owner of the suit patent for flat folded personal respiratory device. The invention was being used against air pollution specifically for dusts. It was alleged by the plaintiffs that the defendants infringed their suit patents….