|

No need to prove actual damage

ByVivek Kumar Verma

CASE LIST

  • Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhai Shah & Anr.; 2002 (24) PTC 1 [Summary]
  • Prakash Glass and Rubber Works & Anr. v . Hindustan Safety Glass Works Pvt. Ltd.; 2006 (2) Calcutta High Court Notes 555 

Similar Posts
| | |

Case List: Procedural aspects of Trademark Law

ByAnkit Rastogi

Procedure prescribed in Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 read with Rule 67 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2002 is mandatory. Union of India Vs. Malhotra Book Depot, 2013 (54) PTC 165 (Del) (DB) [Summary] CIPLA Limited Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks Boudhik Sampada Bhawan and Union of India through Ministry of Commerce Department of…

| | | |

BLUEBERRY BOOKS & ORS. v. GOOGLE INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS.

ByAnkit Rastogi

BLUEBERRY BOOKS & ORS. v. GOOGLE INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS. 2014 (58) PTC 62 In 2003, the Plaintiffs published a series of books under the name ‘Moral Stories’ in 4 Parts. They claimed that the stories contained in the aforementioned books are original literary and artistic works of the Plaintiffs and are protected under…

Wakf Property

ByVivek Kumar Verma

CASE LIST Jurisdiction of Wakf Tribunal M. Bikshapathi vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Ors., 2002 (2) ALT 530 (High Court of Andhra Pradesh, 1999) Jai Bharat Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Andhra Pradesh. State Wakf Board, Hyd., 2000 (5) ALT 389 (High Court of Andhra Pradesh, 2000) Syed Muneer vs. Chief Executive Officer and Ors., 2002 (1) ALT 386 (High Court of…

| |

M/s. Jagdamba Impex v. Tristar Products Pvt. Ltd.

ByAnkit Rastogi

M/s. Jagdamba Impex v. Tristar Products Pvt. Ltd.; 05.05.2014; FAO 128 and 129 of 2014 before the Delhi High Court Plaintiff developed a teeth cutting machine. The machine was based on Industrial Drawing and the Plaintiff was the owner of the said artistic work. The Plaintiff was making commercial use of the said drawings by…

Leave a Reply