No need to prove actual damage
CASE LIST
- Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhai Shah & Anr.; 2002 (24) PTC 1 [Summary]
- Prakash Glass and Rubber Works & Anr. v . Hindustan Safety Glass Works Pvt. Ltd.; 2006 (2) Calcutta High Court Notes 555
Sunder Nagar Association Regd. and Anr. v. Welfare Cultural Club (Regd.) and Anr. 1995 PTC 270 Delhi Plaintiffs, Sunder Nagar Association and Sunder Nagar Women Welfare Association were holding Sunder Nagar Diwali Mela for around 30 years. The same was used to take place in Sunder Nagar Area of Delhi. The Plaintiffs came across an…
INDIA SMC Pneumatics India Pvt. Ltd. v. Jogesh Kwatra, CS(OS) No. 1279/2001 (Delhi High Court, 2001) Avnish Bajaj vs. State, (2005) 3 CompLJ 364 Del (Delhi High Court, 2005) [Summary] Vyakti Vikas Kendra, India Public Charitable Trust Thr Trustee Mahesh Gupta & Ors vs. Jitender Bagga & Anr., CS(OS) No. 1340/2012 (Delhi High Court, 2012) [Summary] Google India Pvt. Ltd….
Titan Industries Vs. Nitin P. Jain and Anr. 2006 (32) PTC 95 (Del) The Plaintiff was incorporated in the year 1987 and its activities included manufacturing and marketing of watches, clocks and jewellery. The cause of filing the suit was the manufacturing and marketing of watches by the Defendants under the trade name/trade mark SONA…
J.R. Kapoor Vs. Micronix India 1994 Supp (3) SCC 215 Respondent as well as the Appellant manufactured and sold various electrical and electronic goods. Respondent filed a suit for injunction against the use of the trade name ‘MICROTEL’, the logo ‘M’ and the Packing carton on the ground that the same is similar to it’s…
CASE LIST If the defendant raises a Credible Challenge to the validity of Patent injunction should not be granted to the plaintiff. V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works; AIR 1965 Mad. 327 M/s. Standipack Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. M/s. Oswal Trading Co. Ltd. and Ors.; AIR 2000 Delhi 23 F. Hoffmann-LA Roche Ltd….
LT Foods Limited v. Heritage Foods (India) Limited; 07.05.2014; FAO (OS) 3 of 2014 before the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court The Appellant filed a suit seeking towards infringement and passing off of it’s trade mark HERITAGE. Respondent was a registered proprietor of the Trade Mark HERITAGE for the same goods. Therefore, the…