Disruption of business of Defendant, not a ground to deny injunction
CASE LIST
- Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions (P) Ltd.; AIR 1977 Delhi 41
Similar Posts
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Vs. Nirulas Corner House (P) Ltd.
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Vs. Nirulas Corner House (P) Ltd. 2008 (37) PTC 237 (Del) Plaintiff was a copyright holder of certain literary and musical works, sound recordings, music videos and cinematograph films. Defendant was engaged in the business of hotels. The Plaintiff found that few audio clippings of songs in which the Plaintiff owned…
Libertel Groep BV v. Benelux-Merkenbureau
Libertel Groep BV v. Benelux-Merkenbureau Case No. C-104/01, European Court of Justice, 6th May, 2003 The Applicant had applied for registration of the Colour Orange for telecommunications goods and services before Benelux Trade Marks Office (BTMO). The application form contained an orange rectangle and in the space for describing the trade mark, the word ‘orange’…
Adverse Possession
CASE LIST: Requirements/ Ingredients Mohd. Kareemuddin Khan and Ors. vs. Syed Azam, 1997 (2) ALT 625 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 1996) Devarapu Narasimharao vs. Yerrabothula Peda Venkaiah and Ors., 1998 (2) ALT 513 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 1997) Dr. K. Subbaiah vs. C.N. Krishnamacharlu and Ors., 2011 (2) ALT 516 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 2010) B.Visalakshi vs. Special Court under A.P. Land…
3M Innovative Properties Company & Anr. Vs. Venus Safety & Health Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
3M Innovative Properties Company & Anr. Vs. Venus Safety & Health Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Plaintiff No. 1 was the owner of the suit patent for flat folded personal respiratory device. The invention was being used against air pollution specifically for dusts. It was alleged by the plaintiffs that the defendants infringed their suit patents….
Taxability of Profit
CASE LIST Taxability of Profit from Supply of Equipment Outside India Ishikawajima Harinia Heavy Industries Ltd. v. DIT, Mumbai, (2007) 3 SCC 481 – No part of profit arising from the supply of equipment outside India would be chargeable to tax in India.
Manisha Koirala v. Shashilal Nair and Ors.
Manisha Koirala v. Shashilal Nair and Ors.; 2003 (1) AllMR 426 Brief Facts: Four scenes of four minutes in a film, titled ‘Ek Chhoti Si Love Story’ were the subject matter of dispute. The story of the film was about an adolescent boy who was obsessed with a girl who was 26 years old and…