Disruption of business of Defendant, not a ground to deny injunction
CASE LIST
- Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions (P) Ltd.; AIR 1977 Delhi 41
Similar Posts
Doctrine of Ultra Vires
CASE LIST Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co. vs. Riche, [1875] L. R. 7 HL 653 When an act is performed or a transaction is carried out, which, though legal in itself, is not authorised by the object clause, in the memorandum of association, such an act is null and void. Attorney General vs. Great Eastern…
Raja Pocket Books v. Radha Pocket Books
Raja Pocket Books v. Radha Pocket Books Before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi 1997 PTC (17) Decided on: 06.12.1996 Plaintiff filed a suit against the Defendant seeking declaration and permanent injunction restraining infringement of Copyright as well as Passing Off by use of the name and character ‘NAGESH’ which was deceptively…
Monsanto Holdings Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Competition Commission of India & Ors.
Monsanto Holdings Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Competition Commission of India & Ors. Date of decision: 20th May, 2020 in W.P. (C) No. 1776/2016 and W.P.(C) No. 3556/2017 by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi Brief Facts: Petitioners, had developed an advance technology of manufacturing Bt. Cotton seeds which they licensed and…
Blacklisting / Holiday List
CASE LIST: Arbitrary Decision to Blacklist: Erusian Equipment and Chemicals Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal and Anr., AIR 1975 SC 266 (Supreme Court, 1975) Siemens Engg. & Mfg. Co. of India Ltd. vs. Union of India, AIR 1976 SC 1785 (Supreme Court, 1976) Mekaster Trading Corporation vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. 2003 (71) DRJ 376…
Haelan Laboratories, Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.
Haelan Laboratories, Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc. 202 F.2d 866 (2d Cir. 1953); US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Date of decision: 16th February, 1953 Brief Facts: The Plaintiff was engaged in selling Chewing Gums. Plaintiff…
V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works
V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works, Melur AIR 1965 Madras 327 Appellant filed a suit against the Respondent for permanent injunction from manufacturing and selling certain patterns of ploughs on the ground that the same was an infringement of the Appellant’s patent. The Appellant secured an interim injunction, but, on an application filed by…