Disruption of business of Defendant, not a ground to deny injunction
CASE LIST
- Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions (P) Ltd.; AIR 1977 Delhi 41
Similar Posts
Raj Rewal v. Union of India & Ors.
Raj Rewal v. Union of India & Ors. CS (Comm) No. 3 of 2018 before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi Date of Decision: 28th May, 2019 Facts of the case: Raj Rewal, the Plaintiff, being an internationally acclaimed architect, designed Hall of Nations and Hall of Industries which was constructed in…
Shield Mark BV v. Joost Kist h o d n Memex
Shield Mark BV v. Joost Kist h o d n Memex; Case No. C-283/01 European Court of Justice Brief Facts: Registrant (Sheild Mark BV) of the mark had 14 registered trade marks in its favour granted by Benelux[1] Trade Marks Office. The registrations were in Class 9 (computer software (recorded), etc.), 16 (magazines, newspapers, etc.),…
aaLAWchak: Scam 1992: The Harshad Mehta Story
Web Series: Scam 1992: The Harshad Mehta Story Starring: Pratik Gandhi, Shreya Dhanwanthary, Rajat Kapur, Satish Kaushik, Anant Mahadevan, Nikhil Dwivedi and others Director: Hansal Mehta Year of Release: 2020 The Indian Web Series space has taken quite a turn where only the Content is the king. Earlier, ‘Mirzapur’ and ‘Paatal Lok’ had received rave…
Walter Bushnell Pvt. Ltd. v. Miracle Life Sciences;
Walter Bushnell Pvt. Ltd. v. Miracle Life Sciences; 26.05.2014; CS(OS) 220 of 2013 before the Delhi High Court Plaintiff Registered Proprietor of DROTIN for medicines claiming user since 1997, Defendants using DROTAMOL The Defendant challenged, the validity of Plaintiff’s mark and the Court observed that “With regard to validity of the trade mark of the…
Dabur India Limited Vs Emami Limited
Dabur India Limited Vs.Emami Limited 2004 (29) PTC 1 (Del) Plaintiff was the manufacturer of Dabur Chayawanprash. Plaintiff had a market share of 63% of the total market of Chayawanprash in India. Defendant was also engaged in the manufacture of various ayurvedic formulations including Chayawanprash. Defendant was manufacturing the said Chayawanprash under the brand name…
Case List: LIABILITIES OF ISPs AND INTERMEDIARIES
FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT Sony Corp. of America vs. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984) [Full Text] Fonovisa, Inc. vs. Cherry Auctions, 76 F.3d 259 (9th Cir. 1996) [Full Text] CoStar Group, Inc. vs. LoopNet, Inc., 373 F.3d 544 (4th Cir. 2004) Viacom International, Inc. vs. YouTube, Inc. 17 U.S.C Sec 512(c) Gordon Roy Parker v. Google, Inc.,…