Disruption of business of Defendant, not a ground to deny injunction
CASE LIST
- Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions (P) Ltd.; AIR 1977 Delhi 41
Meso Private Limited v. Liberty Shoes Ltd. & Ors. Commercial Appeal No. 362 of 2019 before the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay Date of Decision: 8th August, 2019 Facts of the case: Appellant was the registered proprietor of the marks Legend and Flirt in Class 3 for perfumes. The products on which the said…
CASE LIST Reckitt and Colman of India vs. Kiwi TTK Ltd.;1996 16 PTC 393 Hindustan Lever vs. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd.; AIR 1998 SC 526 Reckitt and Colman of India Ltd. vs. M.P. Ramchandran and Anr.; 1999 1 PTC 741 Dabur India Ltd. v. Emami Limited; 112(2004)DLT73 [Summary] Dabur India Limited vs. Colgate Palmolive India…
Financial strength of a company, though relevant, cannot be the sole factor to determine dominant position of an enterprise. Providing free services cannot by itself raise competition concerns unless the same is offered by a dominant enterprise and is shown to be tainted with an anti-competitive objective of excluding competition/ competitors.
Venootschap onder Firma Senta Aromatic marketing’s Application; [1999] E.T.M.R. 429 (Eur. Comm. Trade marks Office, Second Board of Appeal) Brief Facts: The Applicant applied for registration of a smell mark with the description ‘THE SMELL OF FRESH CUT GRASS’ for tennis balls. The Examiner was of the view that the words ‘the smell of fresh…
Haelan Laboratories, Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc. 202 F.2d 866 (2d Cir. 1953); US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Date of decision: 16th February, 1953 Brief Facts: The Plaintiff was engaged in selling Chewing Gums. Plaintiff…
CASE LIST: Arbitrary Decision to Blacklist: Erusian Equipment and Chemicals Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal and Anr., AIR 1975 SC 266 (Supreme Court, 1975) Siemens Engg. & Mfg. Co. of India Ltd. vs. Union of India, AIR 1976 SC 1785 (Supreme Court, 1976) Mekaster Trading Corporation vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. 2003 (71) DRJ 376…