Disruption of business of Defendant, not a ground to deny injunction
CASE LIST
- Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions (P) Ltd.; AIR 1977 Delhi 41
Similar Posts
Dr. Alloys Wobben and Anr. v. Yogesh Mehra and Ors.
Dr. Alloys Wobben and Anr. v. Yogesh Mehra and Ors.; 02.06.2014; Supreme Court of India A Question of law came up before the Supreme Court on the issue of Multiplicity of proceedings for Revocation of Patent. The question was framed as follows, In case, there is already a revocation petition filed by an entity against…
Adverse Possession
CASE LIST: Requirements/ Ingredients Mohd. Kareemuddin Khan and Ors. vs. Syed Azam, 1997 (2) ALT 625 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 1996) Devarapu Narasimharao vs. Yerrabothula Peda Venkaiah and Ors., 1998 (2) ALT 513 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 1997) Dr. K. Subbaiah vs. C.N. Krishnamacharlu and Ors., 2011 (2) ALT 516 (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 2010) B.Visalakshi vs. Special Court under A.P. Land…
M/s. BDR Pharmaceuticals International Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
M/s. BDR Pharmaceuticals International Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Bristol Myers Squibb Co. CLA No. 1 of 2013 before the Controller of Patents, Mumbai Decided on: 29.10.2013 The applicant (M/s. BDR Pharmaceuticals International Pvt. Ltd.) requested the patentee (M/s. Bristol Myers Squibb Co.) for a voluntary license to manufacture and market active pharmaceutical ingredient DASATINIB covered…
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba v. Tosiba Appliances and Ors.
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba v. Tosiba Appliances and Ors. 2008 (37) PTC 394 (SC) Brief Facts: Appellant officially adopted the name Toshiba Corporation only in 1984, it had registered (and was using) the mark “TOSHIBA” in a number of countries (including India) way back in 1953. Since 1953, the Appellant had acquired about 35 trademark registrations…
Libertel Groep BV v. Benelux-Merkenbureau
Libertel Groep BV v. Benelux-Merkenbureau Case No. C-104/01, European Court of Justice, 6th May, 2003 The Applicant had applied for registration of the Colour Orange for telecommunications goods and services before Benelux Trade Marks Office (BTMO). The application form contained an orange rectangle and in the space for describing the trade mark, the word ‘orange’…
Phoolan Devi v. Shekhar Kapoor and Ors.
Phoolan Devi v. Shekhar Kapoor and Ors. 57 (1995) DLT 154, 1995 (32) DRJ 142 BRIEF FACTS: Plaintiff entered into a Contract with Defendant No. 5 to grant Defendant No. 5 sole and exclusive right to make a cinematograph film on her writings (based on Indian banditry and on her life). It was also agreed…