Disruption of business of Defendant, not a ground to deny injunction
CASE LIST
- Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions (P) Ltd.; AIR 1977 Delhi 41
Similar Posts
Bar and Bench’s Law School Photography Competition
1st Prize: Rs. 20,000/-
2nd Prize: Rs. 15,000/-
3rd Prize: Rs. 10,000/-
DEVELOPMENT OF LAW ON REGISTRABILITY AND PROTECTABILITY OF UNCONVENTIONAL TRADE MARKS SUCH AS SHAPE, SOUND, SMELL, COLOUR AND TASTE IN INDIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND EUROPEAN UNION
Unconventional Trade Marks is always an interesting topic in Trade Marks Jurisprudence. The ambit of Unconventional trade marks is ever expanding even to consider something as vague as taste. With capitalism ever increasing, it has become increasingly important for the business entities to protect whatever they think if used by another will decrease their sales…
Ms. Barkha Dutt v. easyticket, Kapavarapu, Vas
Ms. Barkha Dutt v. easyticket, Kapavarapu, Vas Case No. D2009-1247 before Administrative Panel, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Date of decision: 30th October, 2009 Brief Facts: The Complainant, Barkha Dutt, a known figure in the media and particularly recognised for her reporting from conflict regions filed the present Complaint before WIPO for transfer of domain…
THE ADVENTURES OF TOM LAWYER-III
For a background check, please read The Adventures of Tom Lawyer and The Adventures of Tom Lawyer – II. The election mood in Tom’s state was over a few years ago. Tom was going on with his regular life and so were Dick and Harry. However, none of them knew that suddenly their world would…
Bloomberg Finance LP v. Prafull Saklecha & Ors.
Bloomberg Finance LP v. Prafull Saklecha & Ors. CS(OS) No. 2963 of 2012 Before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi Decided on: 11th October, 2013 Facts The Plaintiff a multinational financial news corporation was founded in 1982. Plaintiff operated in India through it’s subsidiary/associate Co. in New Delhi. Plaintiff’s ‘Bloomberg’ Trademark was…
Edison v. Edison Polyform Mfg. Co.
Edison v. Edison Polyform Mfg. Co. 67 A. 392 (N.J. Ch. 1907) In the present case, the Plaintiff was the inventor of electrical instruments and processes and had a huge reputation. He once made a medication for neuralgic pains. Some individuals purchased the rights to the formulation of that medicine for US$ 5000. On November…