Similar Posts
| |

Bright Enterprises Private Ltd. and Ors. v. MJ Bizcraft LLP and Ors.

ByAnkit Rastogi

Bright Enterprises Private Ltd. and Ors. v. MJ Bizcraft LLP and Ors. Decided On: 04.01.2017 Division Bench Delhi High Court Appellants/Plaintiffs, Bright Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. AKM Enterprises filed a civil suit for infringement of trade mark and passing off against the Defendants/Respondents MJ Bizcraft LLP and Shangri-La’s Eros Hotel. Appellants claimed proprietorship of…
| |

Madan Lal Arora v. Soni Udyog and Anr.

ByAnkit Rastogi

Madan Lal Arora v. Soni Udyog and Anr. 1997 (17) PTC 651 (Del) Plaintiff was sole proprietor of M/s. Calcutta Wire Netting Industries. Plaintiff was in the business of manufacturing and marketing Wire and Wire Nettings under the trade mark ‘TIGER’ with device of ‘TIGER’. Defendant was using the mark ‘LION’ with device of ‘LION’…

| |

Wheatley v Drillsafe Ltd.

ByAnkit Rastogi

Wheatley v Drillsafe Ltd.[1] Facts: Wheatley (W), the proprietor and licensee of a European patent relating to a threaded hole cutting device, appealed against a decision[2] holding that the patent was invalid on the ground of common general knowledge and accordingly should be revoked, and also that, in any event, there had been no infringement…

flIPstaan+: Patentability Analysis of Invisibility Device of ‘Mr. India’
| | | |

flIPstaan+: Patentability Analysis of Invisibility Device of ‘Mr. India’

ByAnkit Rastogi

SEASON 1 BONUS EPISODE – 3rd August, 2020 On the fine morning of 2ndof August 2020, Mr. Ankit Rastogi woke me up from my bed, to discuss not so much of a eureka moment. He wanted me to provide him an off the cuff patentability analysis of the invisibility band used by Mr. Arun Verma…

Leave a Reply