Similar Posts

Gurnam Sigh v. G.I. Cosmetics
| | |

Gurnam Sigh v. G.I. Cosmetics

ByAnkit Rastogi

2019 (77) PTC 222 (Del) Brief Facts: Plaintiff was using the mark ‘BLUE HEAVEN’ since 1972 for cosmetic products. Defendant started to use the mark ‘MISS HEAVEN’ in the year 2016 for identical goods. Plaintiff filed a suit for infringement of trade mark and passing off against the Defendant. Along with the suit, the Plaintiff…

| |

Major (Retired) Sukesh Behl & Anr. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics

ByAnkit Rastogi

Major (Retired) Sukesh Behl & Anr. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics Before the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi FAO(OS) No. 16 of 2014 The present Appeal was filed by the Appellants as the Appellant’s application under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Judgment on admission) was dismissed by the…

| |

Midler v. Ford Motor Co. & Others

ByAnkit Rastogi

Midler v Ford Motor Co. & Others (1988) 849 F.2d 460 (9th Cir) The Defendant launched an advertising campaign which was meant to create nostalgic moments through the use of famous songs of past decade. When the original artists of those songs did not agree to those commercials, Defendant hired impersonators to sing the original…

|

Koninklijke Philips Electronics Ltd. v. Remington Consumers Products Ltd.

ByAnkit Rastogi

Koninklijke Philips Electronics Ltd. v. Remington Consumers Products Ltd. C-299/99 European Court of Justice Brief Facts: Plaintiff was the registered proprietor of the following shape mark: In 1966, Philips developed a new type of three headed rotary electric shaver. The three headed shape was registered as a trade mark in the year 1985. In 1995,…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *