Bar and Bench’s Law School Photography Competition
Similar Posts
In Re General Electric Broadcasting Company, Inc.
In Re General Electric Broadcasting Company, Inc. 199 U.S.P.Q. 560 (TTAB, 1978) Brief Facts: Applicant filed an application to register a mark consisting of the sound made by a Ship’s Bell Clock as a service mark for Radio Broadcasting Services. The mark was described as “a series of bells tolled during four, hour sequences, beginning…
CIPLA Limited v. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Ors.
CIPLA Limited v. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Ors. 2017 (69) PTC 425 (Bom) Full Bench A Learned Single Judge of the High Court of Bombay vide order dated 26th April, 2016 expressed the view that decision of the Division Bench of Bombay High Court in the case of Raymond Limited v. Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt….
Kamal Kant & Company LLP v. Raashee Fragrances India Pvt. Ltd.
Kamal Kant & Company LLP v. Raashee Fragrances India Pvt. Ltd. CS(OS) No.1471/2015 4th November, 2015 Plaintiff was a registered proprietor of the trade mark ‘RAJSHREE’ for pan masala, supari, betel nuts, zarda mix, mouth freshener etc. Plaintiff filed a suit against the Defendant who was using the mark ‘RAASHEE’ for infringement of trade mark,…
ESOP under the new Companies Act, 2013
Can ESOPs be issued to the Promoters and Directors under the New Companies Act, 2013? What are the restrictions in terms of percentage? Section 2(37) of the new Companies Act defines employees’ stock option means (ESOP) as- “The option given to the directors, officers or employees of a company or of its holding company or…
Dishonour of Cheque/ Cheque Bouncing: Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
CASE LIST Prosecution based on second or successive dishonour of cheque shall be permissible. MSR Leathers vs. S. Palaniappan and Anr., (2013) 10 SCC 568 (Supreme Court, 2013) [Summary] Territorial Jurisdiction in Cheque Bouncing Case K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vidhyan Balan, (1999) 7 SCC 510 Shri Ishar Alloy Steels Ltd. v. Jayaswals Neco Ltd., (2001) 3 SCC 609 Harman…
V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works
V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works, Melur AIR 1965 Madras 327 Appellant filed a suit against the Respondent for permanent injunction from manufacturing and selling certain patterns of ploughs on the ground that the same was an infringement of the Appellant’s patent. The Appellant secured an interim injunction, but, on an application filed by…