Similar Posts
Case List: Winding Up
A Admitted Debt u/s 433(3) of Companies Act, 1956 Alternative Remedy to be initiated before invoking just and equitable clause u/s 433 (f) B Bona fide dispute C Commercial Insolvency Creditor’s Objection to Winding Up Composite petitions under Sections 397, 398 and 433(f) D Dissolution of Partnership and Deadlock as grounds for Winding Up under Section…
Advantages of Forming a Section 8 Company in India
In a society where businesses are focused on making profits, Section 8 companies stand out due to their focus on purpose, and not profit. A Section 8 company is regulated by the Companies Act, 2013. It is a non-profit company established to advance commerce, arts, science, social welfare, charity, education, research, or sports. Its primary…
Ram Parshotam Mittal vs. Hillcrest Realty SDN Bhd.
Ram Parshotam Mittal vs. Hillcrest Realty SDN Bhd. FACTS For a period of 2 years from the date of purchase of the preference shares by Hillcrest Realty, no dividend was declared or paid by the Hotel Queen Road Pvt.Ltd . Therefore Hillcrest Realty served a notice on Hotel Queen asking the Company to convene an…
Indo Rolhard Industries Ltd. Vs. M.K. Mahajan & Anr.
[2013] 178 CompCas 282 (Delhi) FACTS: A petition was filed by two shareholders for winding up of the appellant-company under section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956. The company court by the impugned order admitted the petition, directed the company to be wound up and, ordered the citation to be published in the “Statesman” (English)…
Company Incorporation
Indian Case Laws, also helps you to incorporate companies under the new Companies Act, 2013. We take care of all the necessary steps starting from name approval to filing of all the MCA Forms, obtaining PAN, DIN (Director Identification Number), DSC etc. Our well qualified practicing Company Secretary (CS) is here to make sure that…
Allied Blenders & Distillers Pvt. Ltd. v. R.K. Distilleries Pvt. Ltd.
Allied Blenders & Distillers Pvt. Ltd. v. R.K. Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. FAO (OS) No. 251 of 2016 Decided on: 28th February, 2017 Hon’ble High Court of Delhi Brief Facts: Appellant filed a civil suit for infringement of trade mark, passing off and infringement of Copyright claiming to be proprietor of the mark ‘Officer’s Choice’ and…