List of Ordinary and Special Resolutions under Companies Act, 2013
List of Ordinary and Special Resolutions under Companies Act, 2013
[Click the link above to download the PDF]
Similar Posts
Progress Property Co Ltd vs. Moorgarth Group Ltd
Progress Property Co Ltd vs. Moorgarth Group Ltd. This case was Before Lord Phillips, President, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Collins, Lord Clarke and the judgement was given on 8 December 2010, referring to the common law prohibition on the unlawful distribution of capital by a company through, inter alia, the sale of its assets…
How is provision of Section 23 of SICA different from the provision of Section 15 of the same Act?
How is provision of Section 23 of SICA different from the provision of Section 15 of the same Act? As quoted by Supreme Court in U.P. State Sugar Corpn. Ltd. Vs. U.P. State Sugar Corpn. Karamchari Assn. and Ors.[1] “From a perusal of the aforesaid provisions of the Act it would appear that the Act…
In Re: Indusind Bank Ltd.
CITATION: (2004) 4 CompLJ 394 Bom DECIDED: May 6, 2004 BEFORE: Bombay High Court FACTS A company petition was filed by the petitioner IndusInd Bank Limited for sanction of Scheme of Arrangement between Ashok Leyland Finance Limited (‘transferor company’) and IndusInd Bank Limited (‘transferee company’) and their respective members and creditors. The Regional Director’s main objection was that…
Miheer H. Mafatlal Vs. Mafatlal Industries Ltd.
The scope of Company Court to sanction scheme of amalgamation is limited and therefore Court can intervene in matter only when it is not just and fair or prejudicial to the interest of share holders. Court can only go through scheme and examine whether it has complied requirements under Section 391 (2) and was passed requisite majority or not. Individual personal interest of minority share holders is of no concern unless it is affecting class interest of such equity shareholders.
Companies Act, 2013
In these presentation slides, find out all the key provisions of new Companies Act, 2013 affecting directors and Key Managerial Personnel (KMP).
Makhan Lal Jain and Anr. v. The Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. and Ors.
Makhan Lal Jain and Anr. v. The Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. and Ors. AIR 1953 All 326 Facts: The petitioners are two share-holders in the Amrit Banaspati Company Limited. They have made various allegations of mismanagement and foul play against the company, its Directors and Managing Agents. It is contended on behalf of the opposite…
very helpful…