Similar Posts
Licenses-Approvals-Registrations
Well, though this is slightly different from what we do at Indian Case Laws but nonetheless it’s not completely useless either. We aim to provide a list of licenses, a particular kind of business need to have in order to operate in a specific industry at a state or central level. We are currently in…
Kamal Kant & Company LLP v. Raashee Fragrances India Pvt. Ltd.
Kamal Kant & Company LLP v. Raashee Fragrances India Pvt. Ltd. CS(OS) No.1471/2015 4th November, 2015 Plaintiff was a registered proprietor of the trade mark ‘RAJSHREE’ for pan masala, supari, betel nuts, zarda mix, mouth freshener etc. Plaintiff filed a suit against the Defendant who was using the mark ‘RAASHEE’ for infringement of trade mark,…
aaLAWchak: QATL
(Image from here) Movie: Qatl Starring: Sanjeev Kumar,Shatrughan Sinha, Ashok Kumar, Marc Zuber & Sarika Directed by: R.K. Nayyar Year of Release: 1986 Introduction Qatl is one of the many films released post the death of Sanjeev Kumar (and is dedicated to him). It is an interesting thriller which gives a new definition to…
REGISTRABILITY OF ‘GENERIC.COM’ MARKS – PART – I: THE MAJORITY OPINION IN USPTO v. BOOKING.COM
Recently, the Supreme Court of United States held that marks which are generic when combined with a top-level domain name may qualify as registrable marks provided the consumers do not consider them to be generic. The decision is in USPTO v. Booking.com B.V.. By an 8: 1 majority the matter has been decided against USPTO….
Intellectual Property Attorneys Association v. The Controller Genreral of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks & Anr.
Intellectual Property Attorneys Association v. The Controller Genreral of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks & Anr. 2019 (80) PTC 486 (Del) Delhi High Court Aggrieved by the practice of the Trade Marks Office of not giving speaking orders toward srefusal of trade mark registration and thereafter relying upon Rule 36 of the Trade Marks Rules,…
Edison v. Edison Polyform Mfg. Co.
Edison v. Edison Polyform Mfg. Co. 67 A. 392 (N.J. Ch. 1907) In the present case, the Plaintiff was the inventor of electrical instruments and processes and had a huge reputation. He once made a medication for neuralgic pains. Some individuals purchased the rights to the formulation of that medicine for US$ 5000. On November…

