No need to prove actual damage
CASE LIST
- Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhai Shah & Anr.; 2002 (24) PTC 1 [Summary]
- Prakash Glass and Rubber Works & Anr. v . Hindustan Safety Glass Works Pvt. Ltd.; 2006 (2) Calcutta High Court Notes 555
Sunder Nagar Association Regd. and Anr. v. Welfare Cultural Club (Regd.) and Anr. 1995 PTC 270 Delhi Plaintiffs, Sunder Nagar Association and Sunder Nagar Women Welfare Association were holding Sunder Nagar Diwali Mela for around 30 years. The same was used to take place in Sunder Nagar Area of Delhi. The Plaintiffs came across an…
CASE LIST Chartered Accountants and Architects, Levy On All India Federation of Tax Practitioners & Ors. vs. Union of India, (2007) 7 SCC 527 Service tax was a value added tax or a general tax which applies to all commercial activities involving production of goods and provision of services. Difference between service tax and sales tax…
CASE LIST The fact that majority has approved the amalgamation scheme is not conclusive, however, it must be taken into account before in sanctioning the scheme. Sugarcane Growers and Sakthi Sugars Shareholders’ Association Vs. Sakthi Sugars Ltd., [1998] 93 CompCas 646 (Mad) J. S. Davar Vs. Shankar Vishnu Marathe, AIR 1967 Bom 456 While the court is not supposed…
CASE LIST Jurisdiction of Wakf Tribunal M. Bikshapathi vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Ors., 2002 (2) ALT 530 (High Court of Andhra Pradesh, 1999) Jai Bharat Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Andhra Pradesh. State Wakf Board, Hyd., 2000 (5) ALT 389 (High Court of Andhra Pradesh, 2000) Syed Muneer vs. Chief Executive Officer and Ors., 2002 (1) ALT 386 (High Court of…
Find out what troubles you can invite by simply linking to a website and asking your website developer to provide for framing web content from other websites. The complete article will follow soon.
Walter Bushnell Pvt. Ltd. v. Miracle Life Sciences; 26.05.2014; CS(OS) 220 of 2013 before the Delhi High Court Plaintiff Registered Proprietor of DROTIN for medicines claiming user since 1997, Defendants using DROTAMOL The Defendant challenged, the validity of Plaintiff’s mark and the Court observed that “With regard to validity of the trade mark of the…