No need to prove actual damage
CASE LIST
- Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhai Shah & Anr.; 2002 (24) PTC 1 [Summary]
- Prakash Glass and Rubber Works & Anr. v . Hindustan Safety Glass Works Pvt. Ltd.; 2006 (2) Calcutta High Court Notes 555
Similar Posts
Case List: Unstamped Instrument
CASE LIST Section 35 of the Stamp Act operates as a bar to an unstamped instrument being admitted in evidence or being acted upon. Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. M/s. Dilip Construction Co., AIR 1969 SC 1238 Unless the stamp duty and penalty due in respect of the instrument is paid, the court cannot act upon…
Composite Contract of Service and Sale
Case History: Prior to the 46th Amendment of the Indian Constitution, composite contracts such as works contracts, hire-purchase contacts and catering contracts were not assessable as contracts for sale of goods. The locus classicus holding the field was State of Madras v. Gannon Dunkerley & Co. 9 STC 353 (SC). The classic concept of sale was…
Well-known Trade Marks
CASE LIST Daimler Benz Aktiegesellschaft & Anr. v. Hybo Hindustan; 1994 PTC 287 [Summary] N.R. Dongre and Ors. vs. Whirlpool Corpn. and Anr.; 1996 PTC (16) 583 (SC), [Summary] Bloomberg Finance LP v. Prafull Saklecha & Ors., CS(OS) No. 2963 of 2012, [Summary] Ford Motor Company v. C.R. Borman; 2014 (59) PTC 132 (Del.) Tata Sons Ltd. v….
Doctrine of Ultra Vires
CASE LIST Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co. vs. Riche, [1875] L. R. 7 HL 653 When an act is performed or a transaction is carried out, which, though legal in itself, is not authorised by the object clause, in the memorandum of association, such an act is null and void. Attorney General vs. Great Eastern…
Assignment of Trademark
CASE LIST It is the assignment of trade mark that creates rights in favour of the assignee and not the registration of assignment as contemplated in Section 45 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. If the application for getting transferred the registered trademark in the office of the Registrar is pending, that does not debar…
3M Innovative Properties Company & Anr. Vs. Venus Safety & Health Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
3M Innovative Properties Company & Anr. Vs. Venus Safety & Health Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Plaintiff No. 1 was the owner of the suit patent for flat folded personal respiratory device. The invention was being used against air pollution specifically for dusts. It was alleged by the plaintiffs that the defendants infringed their suit patents….