No need to prove actual damage
CASE LIST
- Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhai Shah & Anr.; 2002 (24) PTC 1 [Summary]
- Prakash Glass and Rubber Works & Anr. v . Hindustan Safety Glass Works Pvt. Ltd.; 2006 (2) Calcutta High Court Notes 555
Similar Posts
Child Custody
CASE LAWS Custody to Father: Criteria Prakash Chandra Jain vs. Smt. Chandrawati Jain, AIR 1996 Raj 162 (High Court of Rajasthan, 1995 ) Mausami Moitra Ganguli vs. Jayant Ganguli, AIR 2008 SC 2262 (Supreme Court, 2008)
Blacklisting / Holiday List
CASE LIST: Arbitrary Decision to Blacklist: Erusian Equipment and Chemicals Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal and Anr., AIR 1975 SC 266 (Supreme Court, 1975) Siemens Engg. & Mfg. Co. of India Ltd. vs. Union of India, AIR 1976 SC 1785 (Supreme Court, 1976) Mekaster Trading Corporation vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. 2003 (71) DRJ 376…
Dinesh Chandra Vaghani and Ors. Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.
Dinesh Chandra Vaghani and Ors. Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. 2010 (42) PTC 456(Del) Petitioners 1 to 5 had initially set up a partnership firm under the name of M/s. Milton Plastics and had been carrying on the business of manufacturing and marketing under the trade mark and trade name ‘Milton’. A Memorandum…
Case List: Jurisdiction in Cyberspace / Conflict of Laws
CASE LIST Sarl Louis Feraud International vs. Viewfinder, Inc. No. 05-5927-CV, 2007 WL 1598057, 2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Compuserve, Inc. vs. Patterson, 89 F.3d 1257 (6th Cir. 1996) [Text] Zippo Manufacturing Co. vs. Zippo Dot Com, Inc., 952 F. Supp. 1119 (W.D. Pa. 1997) [Text] Panavision International, L.P. vs. Toeppen, 141 F.3d 1316 (9th Cir. 1998), aff’g 945…
Doctrine of Ultra Vires
CASE LIST Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co. vs. Riche, [1875] L. R. 7 HL 653 When an act is performed or a transaction is carried out, which, though legal in itself, is not authorised by the object clause, in the memorandum of association, such an act is null and void. Attorney General vs. Great Eastern…
LT Foods Limited v. Heritage Foods (India) Limited
LT Foods Limited v. Heritage Foods (India) Limited; 07.05.2014; FAO (OS) 3 of 2014 before the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court The Appellant filed a suit seeking towards infringement and passing off of it’s trade mark HERITAGE. Respondent was a registered proprietor of the Trade Mark HERITAGE for the same goods. Therefore, the…