No need to prove actual damage
CASE LIST
- Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhai Shah & Anr.; 2002 (24) PTC 1 [Summary]
- Prakash Glass and Rubber Works & Anr. v . Hindustan Safety Glass Works Pvt. Ltd.; 2006 (2) Calcutta High Court Notes 555
Similar Posts
VAT
CASE LIST State has the power to impose VAT on sale of under-construction Property (under Work Contracts) Gannon Dunkerley and Co. vs. State of Rajasthan, (1993) 1 SCC 364 K. Raheja Development Corporation vs. State of Karnataka, (2005) 5 SCC 162 – As long as the agreement was entered into before the construction was “complete”, it would…
Credible Challenge to the validity of Patent
CASE LIST If the defendant raises a Credible Challenge to the validity of Patent injunction should not be granted to the plaintiff. V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works; AIR 1965 Mad. 327 M/s. Standipack Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. M/s. Oswal Trading Co. Ltd. and Ors.; AIR 2000 Delhi 23 F. Hoffmann-LA Roche Ltd….
LT Foods Limited v. Heritage Foods (India) Limited
LT Foods Limited v. Heritage Foods (India) Limited; 07.05.2014; FAO (OS) 3 of 2014 before the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court The Appellant filed a suit seeking towards infringement and passing off of it’s trade mark HERITAGE. Respondent was a registered proprietor of the Trade Mark HERITAGE for the same goods. Therefore, the…
Case List: Metatagging and Trademark Infringement
Find out what Metatags are all about and how they can make you liable for manipulative Meta Tagging and Cyber Stuffing. Here is the list of all landmark cases in US and India which will be followed by a complete article soon by us.
Walter Bushnell Pvt. Ltd. v. Miracle Life Sciences;
Walter Bushnell Pvt. Ltd. v. Miracle Life Sciences; 26.05.2014; CS(OS) 220 of 2013 before the Delhi High Court Plaintiff Registered Proprietor of DROTIN for medicines claiming user since 1997, Defendants using DROTAMOL The Defendant challenged, the validity of Plaintiff’s mark and the Court observed that “With regard to validity of the trade mark of the…
V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works
V. Manicka Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works, Melur AIR 1965 Madras 327 Appellant filed a suit against the Respondent for permanent injunction from manufacturing and selling certain patterns of ploughs on the ground that the same was an infringement of the Appellant’s patent. The Appellant secured an interim injunction, but, on an application filed by…